Ohio Conference
United Church of Christ

OC Home

Abolishing the Death Penalty in Ohio

Resolution on the Abolition of the Death Penalty
Letter to Ohio Conference Congregations from 
the Rev. Ralph Quellhorst, Ohio Conference Minister

This letter was mailed to all Ohio Conference congregations in July 2002

The Congregations of the Ohio Conference
United Church
of Christ

Dear Friends,

The Ohio Conference of the United Church of Christ held its Annual Gathering on June 14-15, 2002 at Heidelberg College.  The Conference consists of 433 local churches throughout the state of Ohio, Northern Kentucky and West Virginia.   At the Annual Meeting, the delegates adopted a resolution calling for an immediate moratorium on the death penalty and its eventual abolition in the state of Ohio.  I am writing to all the congregations in the Ohio Conference asking for their study and support of the adopted resolution.

A new process was used for the adoption of the resolution which allowed for each individual to express their views regarding this issue in writing. I have enclosed their comments as well as a tally of the vote. I encourage your congregation to study this issue and to express yourselves to the Governor of the State of Ohio on this important question.  I have included a number of materials for you to use in your discussions. Perhaps this would be a good topic for your youth, adult classes or other groups in the life of your church to study. I recognize that these materials speak specifically to Ohio, but the same questions are before Kentucky and West Virginia.

The Conference delegates, composed of laypersons and clergy, expressed their conviction as a people of faith. I am aware that there is a wide variety of opinions within the United Church of Christ regarding this issue.  I can say that the resolution was passed by a 79% a majority of the delegates. When the state imposes the death penalty, it usurps a power over life and death that belongs only to God. A person who murders commits an immoral act both against that person and the community of which the victim is a part.  Likewise, it is our view that the state is immoral when it metes out retribution, an act of revenge, for it both violates the sanctity of life and eliminates the possibility of redemption and the restoration of justice between the offender, the victim, and the community. As members of the United Church of Christ we pray that you share with us, your brothers and sisters, the common conviction that human life is sacred and that no one, not even the state, has the right to violate God’s precious gift.

But we are not only a people of faith; we speak as citizens of a state and as citizens of the United States. We are profoundly pained by what we see as a serious threat to our democratic values of due process and equal protection that are imbedded so deeply within our U.S. Constitution and serve as our twin guarantees of justice for any man or woman who might come before the bar. We see 101 men released from death row in the U.S. because the justice system wrongly convicted them, and we have no idea how many innocent persons have been executed.

In Ohio we see mentally disordered men put to death. Troubling questions still surround the guilt or innocence of John Byrd. We observe that within the courts, procedural issues appear to take precedence over substantive ones. In addition, the imposition of a death sentence depends on the county of jurisdiction, and whether a defendant is black or white, rich or poor. Truly, there is a serious bias in application. Appeals court judges themselves identify instances of prosecutorial misconduct, and the prosecution has many more resources to pursue a capital case than the defense. These are all problems occurring in Ohio. Across the U.S., judges increasingly express reservations about capital cases; the latest is federal Judge Rakoff in New York. Past U.S. Supreme Court justices Marshall, Brennan, and Blackmun could not see any way to redeem the death penalty mechanism. Sitting justices O’Conner, Ginsburg, and Stevens are now signaling concerns about the mechanism. We are at a point where due process and equal protection require our attention and protection.

There are 203 men residing on death row at Marion, and many face the prospect of execution in the immediate future. The Conference requests that our Governor, without delay, follow the examples of Governors Ryan of Illinois and Glendenning of Maryland, and declare a moratorium on capital punishment. A moratorium would enable Ohio to establish a mechanism to evaluate the system of capital punishment from arrest through appeals.  A thorough and rigorous re-examination of the death penalty in Ohio would determine whether in fact it is being justly applied and whether it is right or wrong in principle. Further executions would be stopped pending the outcome of the evaluation. A moratorium would be an expression of our determination to restore and to maintain citizen faith in due process and equal protection. The issues are real and urgent. We in the Conference stand ready to assist in any way you might find helpful to address this issue

Sincerely yours,

Ralph C. Quellhorst
Conference Minister

Ohio Conference home page Top

Abolishing the Death Penalty in Ohio